Author Archive

Keith Olbermann Special on Health Care Tonight – The Drinking Game

Let’s be honest, the only way to watch Keith Olbermann is drunk–blind drunk. That would explain his anemic ratings and his small but loyal following. Real drunks always frequent the same bars.

olberman hate

Since Olbermann is dedicating his show tonight to White House talking points on health care, I figured I might as well make it interesting by creating a drinking game for it.

Note: I don’t recommend watching Countdown, there is always something more entertaining and informative on the Watching Paint Dry network, but if your morbid curiosity gets the better of you make sure you have booze handy.

Take a drink every time Keith does one of the following:

  • Says “sir” in anger. (Three if it’s a “How dare you, sir!)
  • Mentions Sarah Palin (Two if he throws in a pejorative like “failed” or “quitter” first, three if he talks about Trig and the health care he got.)
  • Each time he mentions the bogus 44,000 people who die each year for lack of health insurance number.
  • Each time he mentions 46, 47 or 50 million uninsured. (Do a shot if he uses the new 30 million number.)
  • Praises Canada, France or the UK. (Second sip when he says long lines are a lie.)
  • Each time he says “death panel” and Palin.
  • Each time he claims Republicans have no plan or solutions. Do a shot when he says Republicans want people to die.
  • With every mention of Rush, Hannity, Beck or Levin (aka people with an audience).
  • Finish your drink each time he exploits someone’s personal health care horror story and presents it as the norm.
  • Chug from the bottle if he mentions the fact that Medicare rejects more claims than any other insurance plan in the country.
  • Finish the bottle if he tells the truth about anything, accidentally or on purpose. (I was going to say that you take a drink each time he lies but I don’t want to cause a nationwide wave of alcohol poisoning.)

Feel free to add your own rules in the comments.

Follow these guidelines and you’ll be more drunk than Teddy Kennedy on, well, an average Tuesday in the 70’s. And that might just be enough to tolerate spending an hour watching Keith Olbermann…maybe.

Enjoy!

Tags: ,

No Comments


The Party of “No Ideas” Vs The Party of Failed Ideas – The Fight Between Conservatives and the Media on Health Reform

A friend of mine on Facebook recently wrote the following about an article on the life of the late Irving Kristol:

“Once upon a time, not too many years ago, the Republican Party was the party of ideas. Would even its staunchest supporters say so today? I think not. The sole substance of the Republican Party today is opposition to whatever the Democrats are for, period.”

Were it true, it would be damning.  Thankfully it’s not.

flat-earth-society

My friend, a former White House high-ranking employee in both the Reagan and Bush 41 administrations, grew angry, very angry, about the direction of the Republican Party under President Bush 43, something upon which I agree with him.  But, unlike him, I prefer to stay and fight for what’s right within the party I agree with most, not abandon it. He grew so angry that he voted for Obama in 2008.  Now, I don’t claim to know how any human being works internally, but I don’t understand how someone who claims to be a conservative could make that sort of switch. Simply because your side didn’t live up to their ideals doesn’t mean, to my mind, that  you switch to the side that advocates explicitly the opposite point of view.

But that’s neither here nor there. My friend, and everyone else, is free to vote for whomever they want, for whatever reason they want.  What I take issue with his the common mantra of the Left, echoed by my friend, that Republicans are out of ideas and Democrats are a fountain new ones.

What Democrats are proposing, be it on health care, cap and trade, or any other items on their long “to-do” list, is not new. They’re very old, tired and have been proven wrong.  Do we really need to create “new” arguments against these heavy-handed government intrusions?

Canada, thanks to lawsuits, is moving towards increasing the role of the private sector in health care. (Nothing like an actual ‘public option’ to focus the mind.)  The so-called “green jobs” initiative in Spain has been found to cost 2.2 existing jobs for each job created, a complete failure. If the rest of the world is turning away from these fantasies, what are we doing?

Even as these ideas fail around the world, liberals in Congress and the Obama Administration plow full-speed ahead to force them on us.  There’s a joke about the definition of insanity just sitting there, but I’ll allow you to make it yourself.

On the other hand, there are the über-Leftists like those at the New York Times, and their choir on MSNBC that constantly regurgitates the line that Republicans are bereft of ideas.  You can’t read the intellectually devoid ramblings of Krugman, Dowd or Rich without wondering what planet they live on (then you realize it’s Manhattan and it begins to make a little sense). And you can’t turn on MSNBC without the latest Media Matters/George Soros talking point coming out of the mouths of Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz (though looking at Ed you’d suspect his mouth is a one way street and it’s not out).

“Republicans have no solutions,” “They have no plan,” “They are out of ideas,” are standard fare for these “intellectual giants” while interviewing some committed statist with whom they are 100 percent simpatico.  But when your show prep involves what seems to be a T1 line from the Tides Foundation and Moveon.org directly into your teleprompter, intellectual honesty, or even curiosity, simply isn’t in your wheelhouse.

These merchants of dishonesty spread the lie that the George W. Bush years were somehow the glory days of the free market, deregulation and conservative governance.  They were not.

They blame much of the economic problems we face today on the Reagan years, in addition to Bush 43, as if government regulatory bodies didn’t exist in these years, or their power was somehow muffled amid a stead shrinking of government power.  They also forget the many years in which Democrats controlled Congress and the White House. Listening to the unstable folks at MSNBC, you’d think we had runaway, wild-west conservatism since 1980.

The fact of the matter is this: the solutions proposed today by Republicans–the true, free market reforms, have NEVER been tried. FDR’s wage controls forced employers to marry health insurance to employment, as a way to increase compensation when they weren’t allowed, by federal law, to increase wages. As a result, our health insurance market is targeted to employers, leaving the self-employed or individuals with the short straw.

People are not free to buy health insurance across state lines, but large companies are.  Small businesses cannot partner with each other to lower premiums for better health insurance. The federal government prohibits this. The mythical conservative Utopia programmed into the minds of these Chatty Cathy dolls on MSNBC and the Times not only doesn’t exist, it has never existed in the modern age.

So why should conservatives abandon the free market concepts that have proven to work elsewhere in the economy simply because they aren’t “new”? The answer is they shouldn’t.  Correct ideas should not be abandoned simply because they’ve been around a while.  Yes, they do need to articulate them more often, and more clearly, but to say they have no ideas is simply dishonest.

Then again, you’d have better luck Snipe hunting than finding honesty on MSNBC or the opinion pages of the Times.

Tags: ,

No Comments


Celebrities Need Health Care Help Too! (Just Not In the Way You Think)

For those who watch MSNBC regularly and aren’t related to any of the hosts–and I mean both of you–you are familiar with the Will Farrell Funny or Die video that came out a few weeks ago on health care.  I don’t want to embed it, but it was essentially multi-millionaires sarcastically talking about other multi-millionaires because they didn’t like how they made their money.  Seems it’s OK to make hundreds of millions of dollars speaking the words other people wrote on camera, but running a company that pays for other people’s health care should be something that only earns one just enough to get by.

That’s not to say that health insurance is perfect; some do some shady things and some people get hurt, but just because liberals find the worst case scenario and present them as the norm doesn’t make it so. The vast majority of Americans are satisfied with their health coverage. They aren’t masochists who like being screwed over when the chips are down; they get what they need when they need it.

will-ferrell-20080228043332232

And that’s not to say Will Ferrell doesn’t deserve the money he makes either, though I’m fairly certain he didn’t return any of the millions he was paid for Bewitched when it became the Ishtar of 2005.

If, as the Funny or Die video seems to imply, someone is to be paid based upon their contributions to society, health insurance executives do deserve to make a lot of money. Certainly they deserve to make more than someone who gets paid $20 million for 1-3 months worth of work, especially when the result of that work is something like Land of the Lost.

But that’s neither here nor there. 

I don’t resent the money anyone makes because I know it’s not a zero-sum game.  Just because someone earns more than I do doesn’t mean I’m making less.

But Ferrell and others from the pampered class felt the need to weigh in on the health care debate, perhaps because, and I’m just speculating here, they thought they could get an NEA grant if they did.  Whatever the reason, they brought as much knowledge and expertise to the table as, well, the table had, before they set anything down on it.

To illustrate this point (seriously, who is going to consult ANYONE in that video on matters of public policy?), I found this video pointing out the absurdity of the FoD piece.

[There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. Visit the blog entry to see the video.]

While the MSNBC crowd won’t understand the irony or get the humor of taking policy advice from people who list “Monologs for Student Actors” as one of their favorite books, I hope the rest of you do.

PS – I finally got around to watching the Ed Show on MSNBC the other day and it took me three full segments before I realized Wilbur wasn’t coming because it wasn’t a remake of Mr. Ed.

Tags: ,

No Comments


Celebrities Need Health Care Help Too! (Just Not In the Way You Think)

For those who watch MSNBC regularly and aren’t related to any of the hosts–and I mean both of you–you are familiar with the Will Ferrell Funny or Die video that came out a few weeks ago on health care.  I don’t want to embed it, but it was essentially multi-millionaires sarcastically talking about other multi-millionaires because they didn’t like how they made their money.  Seems it’s OK to make hundreds of millions of dollars speaking the words other people wrote on camera, but running a company that pays for other people’s health care should be something that only earns one just enough to get by.

That’s not to say that health insurance is perfect; some do some shady things and some people get hurt, but just because liberals find the worst case scenario and present them as the norm doesn’t make it so. The vast majority of Americans are satisfied with their health coverage. They aren’t masochists who like being screwed over when the chips are down; they get what they need when they need it.

will-ferrell-20080228043332232

And that’s not to say Will Ferrell doesn’t deserve the money he makes either, though I’m fairly certain he didn’t return any of the millions he was paid for Bewitched when it became the Ishtar of 2005.

If, as the Funny or Die video seems to imply, someone is to be paid based upon their contributions to society, health insurance executives do deserve to make a lot of money. Certainly they deserve to make more than someone who gets paid $20 million for 1-3 months worth of work, especially when the result of that work is something like Land of the Lost.

But that’s neither here nor there. 

I don’t resent the money anyone makes because I know it’s not a zero-sum game.  Just because someone earns more than I do doesn’t mean I’m making less.

But Ferrell and others from the pampered class felt the need to weigh in on the health care debate, perhaps because, and I’m just speculating here, they thought they could get an NEA grant if they did.  Whatever the reason, they brought as much knowledge and expertise to the table as, well, the table had, before they set anything down on it.

To illustrate this point (seriously, who is going to consult ANYONE in that video on matters of public policy?), I found this video pointing out the absurdity of the FoD piece.

[There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. Visit the blog entry to see the video.]

While the MSNBC crowd won’t understand the irony or get the humor of taking policy advice from people who list “Monologs for Student Actors” as one of their favorite books, I hope the rest of you do.

PS – I finally got around to watching the Ed Show on MSNBC the other day and it took me three full segments before I realized Wilbur wasn’t coming because it wasn’t a remake of Mr. Ed.

Tags: ,

No Comments


Obama votes “present” in health care debate.

Say what you will about the health reform bill introduced by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), and the Left is having a field day attacking it, but at least it is a plan. President Obama has spent months talking about what he wants out of a bill, but when the chips are down and the polls are crashing, all we get from him is a two and half page outline.  Why would he offer such weak leadership?

One possible answer, for you cynics out there (and I may be one), is that he has zero leadership experience and this is simply his way of voting “present” one more time. But that’s too easy and too amateurish for someone so politically savvy.

ObamaMess

The only logical answer is he doesn’t want to be pinned down on any specifics.  Sure, he’s talked about what he’d like in a bill, but he’s pretty much disavowed everything he’s said he supports too. He wants a public option one day, but doesn’t need one the next, then explains how it is vital to “real reform.” It literally can’t be both but that hasn’t stopped him from having it both ways.

So at this point, whenever anyone criticizes Obamacare the White House has the perfect defense, “There is no bill.” You can’t win a shadow boxing match, you can’t pick a lock with mashed potatoes, and you can’t pin any unpopular proposals on the President.

This works very well in a campaign because it frustrates your opponent and leaves the public to judge you based mainly on your personality, not your policies.  But it’s about as effective a way to lead a nation as would be hiring Kanye West to be pointman for rehabbing your public image.

In 2003, I spent a lot of time fighting the proposed Medicare prescription drug entitlement because it was simply rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic without addressing the iceberg ahead.  Back then, President Bush outlined the reforms he wished to see in Medicare in order to incorporate a prescription drug benefit.  Those reforms were good, and crucial to the fiscal health, not only of Medicare but of the country as a whole. But all he did was introduce general principles, not a specific plan; he left the details to Congress.  They ended up slapping a massive unfunded entitlement on top of an even more massive unfunded entitlement, patted themselves on the back for being so compassionate and sat back down in their deck chairs while speeding ever faster into the northern Atlantic.  President Obama is leading us down the same path.

Real leadership risks unpopularity for righteousness.  It was just as bad when President Bush left the wheel for Congressional Republicans to steer as it is for President Obama to hand it to those in his own party.

The American people do not want what Democratic leaders are pushing, but they’ve demonstrated a tin-ear to public opinion, opting for ideology over their duty.  This is where strong leadership can play a role.

No one disputes there is room for reform in our health care system; nothing involving human beings is perfect.  But by refusing to take a true leadership role, President Obama has allowed the extreme partisans to take over, and he leaves us now with talk of ramming a bill through the Senate by utilizing a budgetary trick called “reconciliation.”

With all the claims of a desire for bi-partisanship, the President doesn’t seem very “bi” curious.  Lip-service paid to reform ideas important to conservatives are discarded faster than a wet Kleenex during cold season.  If the President isn’t willing to step-up and lead by including real reform ideas important to the Right, like tort reform and allowing the purchase of insurance across state lines, we’re going to end up with a partisan bill that may or may not pass the House, that will need to be rammed through the Senate and will have to be signed by Obama because he’s put all his chips on double zero and a loss would make him less relevant faster than just about any President in history.

All is not lost; not yet anyway. Since he has been so nebulous about his “plan,” he still has time to cobble together a bill that lowers costs and allows more people to obtain coverage without harming the vast majority of Americans that have coverage.  But there is nothing in his past or his present that would lead anyone to think he has the spine to do it.

Republicans, for their part, shouldn’t be looking to reinvent the wheel here.  Simple reforms, in the form of a simple bill, could be the PR coup they need.  Real, simple reform needs to contain the following:

  • Tort reform to make it cheaper to be a doctor will make medical care less expensive;
  • the ability to buy plans across state lines will allow victims of a state like New Jersey to escape expensive plans due to excessive mandates;
  • the ability of like businesses and individuals through civic organizations to band together to have more buying power, therefore obtain lower premiums;
  • changing the tax code to treat the individual market the same as the employer provided one;
  • refundable and advanceable tax credits for those that explicitly demonstrate need.

Only one of those reform proposals cost money, and only a little.  While in a perfect world the government would stay out of the health insurance game, we don’t live in a perfect world.  With Presidential leadership these minor tweaks could make a huge difference to all Americans without a massive infringement or take-over of a 1/7 of our economy.  That’s assuming making heath insurance is more widely available and more affordable is the real goal, but that’s a question for another day…

Tags: ,

No Comments



SetPageWidth